FUCK YOU BBC! Political Editor Of The BBC Apologies For Describing The Attackers Of British Solider As Being "Of Muslim Appearance"

MUSLIM! MUSLIM! Michael Adebolajo

You British are all fucked in the head!

It's not as if this stupid and asinine apology appeared on the very same day (May 22nd) of the attack when all the information was not available  - no this apology was posted on the BBC website the very next day when it was confirmed that the attackers were indeed Muslim scum.

I hate the British just as the next guy and wish them nothing but all the hell that they deserve, but this is just completely beyond belief. Listen up Protestant England you deserve everything that is coming your way for all the evil you and your demented and evil ancestors did to the Roman Catholics over the last 500 years. Happy anniversary! Enjoy the fruit of you cowardly rejection of the One True Faith may your Island sink slowly into the sea!

Here is the demented and unbelievable apology by a stupid son of a bitch! For this one reason alone may this idiot rot in the pit hell with all his Muslims brothers for refusing to call a thing by its proper name.

One phrase and why I'm sorry I quoted it 

By Nick Robinson BBC Political Editor & Fucking Idiot!

23 May 2013 Last updated at 06:43 ET

It was a barbaric attack carried out in broad daylight on the streets of London. A man hacked to death. The attackers had been shot by the police. An extraordinary and horrific story but not one, you might think, for the Political Editor of the BBC.

However, the fact that the victim was wearing a "Help for Heroes" T-shirt and was walking near an army barracks raised the possibility that it was something else as well - an act of terrorism with implications for the country as a whole. That was my instinct as soon as I heard about the story, but instinct is not enough. I started to try to establish whether the government was treating it that way.

With minutes to go before the BBC News at Six I was told by a senior Whitehall source that the incident was being treated as a suspected terrorist incident and being taken very seriously indeed. This information changed the news from a crime story to something of more significance. The police had, I was told, described the attackers as being "of Muslim appearance" and shouting "Allahu Akbar". On air I directly quoted a senior Whitehall source saying that the police had used that description.

That phrase "of Muslim appearance" clearly offended some who demanded to know what it could possibly mean. Others were concerned that it was a racist generalisation.

My report and the quotation were picked up by many other news organisations as evidence that this was a terror attack. The reports of eye witnesses and the video of the attacker demonstrated that the attack had been carried out by those claiming to be retaliating because "Muslims are dying daily by British soldiers".

Despite this and the fact that I was directly quoting a source I'm sorry for using a phrase that, on reflection, was both liable to be misinterpreted and to cause offence. Many Muslims were quick to condemn the attack and to distance themselves and their religion from the brutal savagery seen on the streets of Woolwich.

The overnight protests of the English Defence League and attacks on some mosques lead some to fear the consequences for community relations. This all makes people understandably sensitive about anything which could be used to justify hostility to people on the basis of their appearance or religion.

You're a fucking little prick! Rot in Hell with Muhammad:

See how I rend myself, see how mangled is Mohammed!

Inferno xxviii.