Two Face Napoleon of La Salette Archbishop Viganò: Bergoglio Is An ‘Anti-Pope,’ Benedict’s Resignation Was ‘Certainly Invalid’

"The Pagans call NOE, Janus painting him with two faces the one looking backward and the other forward, because NOE had seen, as it were, two worlds , the one before the flood , and the other after the flood." From a Catholic Priest 1600's

ARCHBISHOP VIGANO IS THE TWO FACE NAPOLEON:

LA SALETTE PROPHECY ON TWO FACE NAPOLEON:

“May the curate of my Son, Pope Pius IX never leave Rome again after 1859; may he, however, be steadfast and noble, may he fight with the weapons of faith and love. I will be at his side. May he be on his guard against Napoleon: he is two-faced, and when he wishes to make himself Pope as well as Emperor, God will soon draw back from him. He is the master-mind who, always wanting to ascend further, will fall on the sword he wished to use to force his people to be raised up. Our Lady of La Salette 19 Sept. 1846 (Published by Mélanie 1879) 

Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò is the Two Face Napoleon of La Salette: 

One face looking backward and one face looking forward. This is the reason why Our Lady of La Salette used the words Two Faced Napoleon when describing a man who desires to be both Pope and Emperor. Not because of his duplicity alone but because of his place in history. This two faced Napoleon like Janus/NOE lives before Vatican II and is alive after Vatican II. This two faced Napoleon looks back on a Church during its Traditional days or before Vatican II and he looks forward during the Church's dark days or after the destruction of Vatican II. Who is this two faced Napoleon? I always wondered about this two faced Napoleon. I don't believe that this two faced Napoleon was Napoleon III. Pope Pius IX died in 1878 Napoleon III died in 1873 So why would Mélanie include the above names in the message published in 1879? Both men were long dead when Mélanie published the 1879 message. Napoleon III never wanted to be Pope. This two faced Napoleon wants to be both Pope and Emperor This reason alone tells me that this two faced Napoleon has to be a prelate. Laymen don't want to be a Pope - the Prelate does. Many Popes in history desired to usurp the Divinely Ordained Temporal Authority of the Holy Roman Emperor. So this two faced Napoleon will be a prelate. And his two faced Napoleon must be alive before Vatican II and must be still alive today. Who fits this bill? His birth date is 16 January 1941 (age 83) His Ordination is 24 March 1968 This man saw both the Church in its glory and its darkness. This two faced Napoleon is Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò ~ dxv515 

 **************************************************************************

Archbishop Viganò: Bergoglio is an ‘anti-Pope,’ Benedict’s resignation was ‘certainly invalid’

In a lengthy print interview with Catholic podcaster Dr. Taylor Marshall, Archbishop Viganò said, 'I consider Jorge Mario Bergoglio an anti-Pope — or better said, a counter-pope, a usurper, an emissary of the anti-Catholic lobby that has infiltrated the Church for decades.'(LifeSiteNews) — In a wide-ranging print interview with Dr. Taylor Marshall, Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò has stated that he considers Pope Francis to be an “anti-Pope” and that Benedict XVI’s resignation in 2013 was “certainly invalid” due to its “procedural defects.”

“The invention of the ‘papacy Emeritus’ further undermined the Petrine Primacy and opened the way to that ‘shared papacy’ — in a surreal division of munus and ministerium without any theological or canonical basis — which is today evolving into a reinterpretation of the role of the Pontiff in an ecumenical key,” His Excellency said.

Continuing, Viganò charged that Benedict XVI’s “redefinition of the Petrine institution and his creation of the ‘papacy emeritus’ constitute the maximum expression of the heretical instances of Ratzingerian theology, and as such must be the object of a very precise condemnation, together with other heresies (well highlighted by the studies of eminent Professor Radaelli) that the German theologian never disavowed.”

Marshall is a popular Texas-based Traditional Catholic author and podcaster. He recently sent a list of questions to Viganò, the former Apostolic Nuncio to the United States. Marshall, who released the interview in two parts on YouTube, asked the archbishop about the Third Secret of Fatima as well as the Vatican Bank, Summorum Pontificum, and a variety of other topics pertaining to the papacy and the duties of Traditional priests.

n his lengthy response, Viganò said, “I consider Jorge Mario Bergoglio an anti-Pope — or better said, a counter-pope, a usurper, an emissary of the anti-Catholic lobby that has infiltrated the Church for decades.”

His Excellency identified the “most dangerous” men in the Vatican today as being Vatican Secretary of State Cardinal Pietro Parolin, doctrinal chief Cardinal Victor Fernández, liberal Cardinal Jean-Claude Hollerich, anti-Latin Mass Cardinal Arthur Roche, and Venezuelan prelate Archbishop Edgar Peña Parra.

While urging priests to only offer the Latin Mass, Viganò, who the Vatican recently said incurred automatic excommunication for rejecting the Second Vatican Council and Francis as the pope, argued that a “holy pope” would nullify Vatican II and “abolish the Novus Ordo and restore the Traditional Liturgy.”

His Excellency further told Marshall that concerns over the authenticity of the Third Secret of Fatima that was revealed by the Vatican in the year 2000 are “well-founded.”

“Beyond the anomalies and technical inconsistencies — such as the format of the paper support used by Sister Lucia — it seems clear to me that the revealed content was censored, so as not to confirm what is there for all to see: the demolition of the Catholic Church from within and the apostasy of the faith through a ‘bad Council’ and a ‘bad Mass’,” he said.

Viganò also commented on groups of Traditional clergy who offer the Latin Mass. In one instance, he accused the Priestly Society of St. Pius X of “showing signs of tiredness.” He said that “sometimes it seems that [the SSPX’s] silence about the horrors of Santa Marta is motivated by a tacit agreement of non-belligerence, perhaps in the hope of [becoming] the collector of conservatism and part of Catholic traditionalism, once Bergoglio has eliminated ‘the competition’ of the former Ecclesia Dei institutions.”

Lastly, His Excellency commented on the subject of sedevacantism.

“Even if it is appropriate to suspend … judgment on the popes of the Council, it is necessary to put everything that they have produced ‘in parenthesis’ so to speak,” he said.

At the same time, Viganò stated that “it is not possible to believe that the Lord allowed His Church to remain eclipsed and deprived of the ordinary means of Grace — the Sacraments — for over sixty years, with Bishops and priests not validly ordained and therefore with invalid Mass and Sacraments.” Source