Of Apollinares Who Supposed The Human Nature Of Jesus Christ Only Half Human Nature He Supposed That Christ Had No Soul
ARTICLE III.
Heresies of the Fourth Century
Of Apollinares.
75. We have now to speak of Apollinaris, who was condemned in the same Council of Constantinople. He was Bishop
of Laodicea, and St. Jerome's master in sacred literature; but he
broached another heresy, concerning the person of Jesus Christ.
His principal error, as Noel Alexander tells us, on the authority
of St. Epiphanius, St. Leo, St. Augustin, and Socrates (6), was,
that he supposed the human nature of Jesus Christ only half
human nature he supposed that Christ had no soul, but that, in
place of one, the Word made flesh answered as a soul to his
body. He softened down this doctrine a little after, for then he
admitted that Christ was not without a soul altogether, for he
possessed that part of the sensitive soul, with which we see and
feel in common with all other sensitive beings ; but that he had
not the reasoning part, or the mind, and the Word, he said,
supplied that in the Person of Christ. This error is founded on
the false philosophy of Plato, who wished to establish in man
three substances, to wit the body, the soul, and the mind.
(6) Nat. t. 8, ar. 3, ex St. Epiph. Her.
Fleury, I 18, n. 1, & seq.; Nat. 77; St. Leo, Ser. de Nat. Dom. ;
, .
- 37 ur 2 St - Au - t] e n er. c. 55; Socrat.
. /. 12, c. 2. 2, c. 36?
76. The Apollinarists added three other errors : First, that
the body of Christ, born of Mary, was consubstantial with the
Divinity of the Word, and hence it followed that the Divinity
of the Word was passible, and suffered, in reality, torments and
death. Eranistes, an Apollinarist, contended that the Divine
Nature suffered in the flesh, just as the soul suffers, conjoined
with the body, in the sufferings of the body. But even in this
illustration he was in error, because the body without the soul is
not capable of suffering, and, when the body is hurt, it is the
soul that suffers in reality, by the communication it has with the
body ; so that, according to their system, the Divine Nature
would suffer, if the flesh, supposed to be consubstantial to the
Divinity, was hurt. The second error was, that the Divine
Word did not take flesh from the Virgin, but brought it down
from heaven, and, on that account, they called the Catholics,
who believed that the body of Christ was taken from Mary,
Homicolists, and accused them of establishing, not a Trinity, but
a Quaternity, of Persons, because, besides the three Divine
Persons, they admitted a fourth substance, entirely distinct,
Christ-God, and Man. Thirdly The last error was, that the
Divine substance of the Word was converted into flesh ; but
these three errors, N. Alexander says, were not taught by
Apollinaris, but by his disciples (7). Apollinaris erred also in
the doctrine of the Trinity, by teaching that there were different
degrees of dignity in the Trinity itself. He calls the Holy
Ghost great, the Son greater, and the Father greatest. He,
likewise, taught the errors of the Millenarians, and said that the
Jewish rites ought to be resumed (8). Fleury and Orsi, like
wise, give an account of his heresy (9).
(7) Nat. ibid.
(8) Nat. ibid. (11) St. Greg. Niss. Serm. de St.
(9) Fleury, t. 3, /. 17, n. 225 ; Orsi, Enhreiu.
t: 7, I 16, n. 115.
77. The heresy of Apollinaris, especially that part of it
referring to the Mystery of the Incarnation, was already
condemned, in the year 362, by St. Athanasius, in the Council of
Alexandria ; it was also condemned, in 373, by St. Damasus in
the Roman Council, and the same year Bernini tells us that
Apollinaris died, the laughing-stock of the people, even of the
children (10). An author, quoted by St. Gregory of Nyssa (11),
relates, that Apollinaris, being in his dotage, gave the book containing his doctrines to a lady of Antioch, a disciple of his, to keep
for him ; this came to the knowledge of St. Ephraim the Syrian,
who was then at Antioch, and he borrowed the book for a few
days, from the lady : he took it home and pasted the leaves one
to the other, so that nothing could open them, folded up the
book, and sent it back again to the lady. Soon after this he had
a Conference with Apollinaris, and they began to dispute about
the doctrines of his book, in presence of a great many persons.
Apollinaris, weakened in his intellect, on account of his great
age, said that the answers to St. Ephraim s arguments would be
all found in his book, and he sent to the lady for it ; but when
he tried to open the first page he found it pasted up, and the
whole book just like a log of wood ; he was so enraged that he
dashed it violently to the ground and trampled on it, and ran out
of the place as fast as ever he could, amid the laughter of the
bystanders, who continued hooting after him as long as he was in
sight. It is said that the, poor old man took it so much to heart,
that he fell sick and died. Finally, this heresy was condemned
in the Second General Council, (the first of Constantinople,) as
appears in the Synodical letters : " !N"os pra3terea doctrinam
DominicsB Incarnationis integram & perfectam tenemus, neque
dispensationem carnis Christ! vel anima?, vel mentis expertem,
vel imperfcctam esse asserimus; sed agnoscimus Verbum Dei
ante secula omnino perfectum horninem in novissimis diebus pro
nostra salute factum esse" (12).
(10) Bernin. t. 2, s. 4, c. 8.
(11) St. Greg. Niss. Serm. de St.
(12) N. Alex. t. S. c. 3, a. 1481. (14) St. Epip. Her. 79
Heresies of the Fourth Century
69 74. Heresy of Macedonius.
75 77. Of Apollinaris.
78. Of Elvidius.
79.Of Aetius.
80, 81. The Messalians.
82.The Priscillianists.
83. Jovinians.
84. Other Heretics.
85.Of Audeus, in particular.
THE HISTORY OF HERESIES, AND THEIR REFUTATION.ST. ALPHONSUS M. LIGUORI
Comments
Post a Comment